Blockchain startup Ripple has to hand over internal meeting recordings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Why did the lawsuit start in the first place and what are the main Defense/Prosecution fronts?
Attorney Jeremy Hogan sees the next “Big” ruling to come no sooner than January 2022.
YEREVAN (CoinChapter.com) – SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit is nowhere near an end. Still, attorney Jeremy Hogan, who has been vocal on the case throughout the hearings, says he sees the next significant ruling to come in Jan 2022.
The attorney based the time estimation on his experience in this case and the common practice in New York. In the meantime, the lawsuit is still in the discovery phase, meaning each party investigates the facts of the case “through the rules of civil procedure.”
SEC vs Ripple. What happened?
Before discussing the current proceedings, a small flashback into the case is warranted. The US Securities and Exchange Commission filed the said lawsuit in Dec 2020, accusing Ripple of selling $1.3 billion worth of its native token XRP as unregistered securities. Since then, both parties have worked out several angles of prosecution and defense.
One of the Defense fronts was Fair Notice, as Ripple claimed the law enforcement agency never notified them about the upcoming lawsuit.
Additionally, the SEC has earlier declared ALL of XRP transactions since the ICO (initial coin offering) in violation of the US investment law. Ripple fired back, accusing the agency of bias towards XRP.
The company claimed that as SEC signed both Bitcoin and Ethereum off as cryptocurrencies as early as 2018, there is no evidence to suggest XRP should get the short end of the stick.
Thus, Ripple filed a motion to investigate SEC’s internal documentation and the agency’s emails with third-party experts. The purpose was to possibly reveal a referral to XRP as ‘cryptocurrency’ and not a ‘security.’
It is noteworthy that the SEC handed no such documentation, despite Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn’s ruling six months ago. Instead, it filed a similar motion to discover video and audio recordings of internal Ripple meetings.
Fast forward to the recent development; Judge Netburn granted the motion.
Ripple to hand out internal recordings
James K. Filan, an attorney involved in the case, tweeted about the latest development on Nov 9, with details on the Judge’s ruling in the thread.
#XRPCommunity#SECGov v. #Ripple#XRP 1/6 Judge Netburn granted the SEC’s Motion to Compel Ripple to search for and turn over video and audio recordings of internal Ripple meetings. But the Order had limitations as described below. Judge Netburn ruled as follows:
Mr. Filan specified that not all the recordings are a matter of interest, as there are more than 4,000 of them.
While the Court recognizes that a human review of the recordings may be unreasonable, a reasonable search could include automated transcriptions of recordings (similar to the common technology used to transcribe voicemail messages) and the use of search terms. Accordingly, Ripple is ORDERED to conduct a reasonable search of the relevant video and audio-taped recordings and produce responsive documents.
Mr. Hogan retweeted the message above, adding his thoughts on when the lawsuit could end. He believes that the current ruling is meek, compared to the “BIG” one on Fair Notice Defence that could come in January. The John Wick meme intensified the message, and the tweet sparked a cascade of questions.
We expected this Order to go against Ripple.
Remember, an Order like this might give the SEC some bullets for its gun (and vice versa when Ripple wins), but the next BIG Order is on the SEC's motion to strike the Fair Notice Defense. THAT is the bazooka! https://t.co/SlceyDyuUVpic.twitter.com/iUklgr8x9k
Most of the questions concerned the possible end of the lawsuit and significant rulings underway. Several of Mr. Hogan’s followers asked the attorney for a timeframe and got the same answer.
Mr. Hogan also added that similar proceedings in New York state seem to wait for the discovery phase to end before the Judge addresses the dispositive motions. Therefore the attorney sees no big ruling before January. If his prediction pans out, SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit could drag well into Q1 2022.
Lilit is a Yerevan-based Markets writer, skilled in 3 languages, and interested in writing about the tech world, trading, art, and science. She also has a background in psychology and marketing, which helps deliver the right message to the target audience.
Launch of Australia's first Bitcoin ETF got delayed due to an unidentified broker, while Grayscale renewed its attempts for...
Our Partners
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.